Seeds: 104 Leechers: 90 |
Language: English Runtime: 161 min Audio: AC3 Resolution: 704x480 Frame Rate: 29.9 fps Video Audio Bitrate: 440 kbps |
|
Year: 2002
Genre: Adventure, Family, Fantasy
Director: Chris Columbus
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson
Genre: Adventure, Family, Fantasy
Director: Chris Columbus
Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson
Users review: Not a fan of the Harry Potter movies, I toddled along to the first viewing of this film at my local UGC Cinema and thirly sit and enjoy this movie, but not in the way I would expect something like Lord of the Rings or Spider-Man. Of course Harry Potters target audience is younger so I could see how I might have enjoyed it both slightly younger audience, but to say the least it was better than some of the crap that fizzled this the day. Wrong not and a year on the main characters are much older, taller and voice breaking. Most of the original cast returns, and some new characters appearing in Kenneth Branagh and Jason Isaacs as. Kenneth Branagh played Gilderoy Lockhart wonderful seem to think hes adored by everyone and quite frankly is adored by women for his charm and bravado. It is one of the best bits in the film Jason Isaacs as Lucius Malfoy who plays father of Draco. Jason sports a long wig and plays wicked good father / villain down to the T. He plays it like his villain in The Patriot. I sometimes phased by Rupert Grint Ron. It's not a great actor, but he can play rewarded. He could have done better, but then I have not read the book, so I do not know how Ron will act. I think he played scary scenes (pretty much) in werent convincing enough for me, but the kids have to get a good laugh out of it more than me. I suppose you cant blame the kids that are not normal because they're young and just learning the business actors, but for those who have them and they should get a pat on the back. The best SFX, especally character Dobby. Big. I couldnt tell the bad CG since its creation, but the fact there was no way that can make otherwise. Even the CG character of Dobby almost like Gollum in Lord of the Rings and CG Asgard in the television series Stargate SG-1 (texture speaking) well spoken for Stargate SG-1 if it can also make movie like this ... and above. The CG Spider is very creepy and realistic. Not too scared of spiders, they kind of made me jump. I feel the body up tension gave Harry and Ron, that is a good thing because I often find myself doing in the film. The person sitting next to me seemed a bit scared of spiders too. Score John Williams is very similar to the original score to the old theme back and some music that sounds like music from Indiana Jones his score. I found myself whistling the main theme of Harry Potter for most of the night and on occasion I did not realize until someone else showed off me. The film definitely has better action sequences and much more action focused than 1 Potter movies. I found myself clenching up in their eyes really tight. The story is not too difficult to understand from the point of non-potter fans view movies and much shorter than I expected. I think that lasted for three hours when it is more like 2 1/2. In some cases I found that you had to have seen the first film to understand some of what is happening, but that is due to the story behind the person can not be pronounced, and some gags. The only thing that annoyed me is that the sign in the foyer too long and I couldnt get some ice cream and a little boy crying the front row for a few minutes in the middle of the road. Why bring whos young children will forget about the film next week? You may be asking yourself. If you're not crazy-potter fan then I suggest you wait a few weeks so that you're not even walk with men who stood 4 feet tall ... ie. CHILDREN! (Im not talking about the dwarfs) The giving 8.5/10. But I'm not a big fan of this movie and I'm not the target audience. Thats a good thing in case you're wondering. |
No comments:
Post a Comment